I think there is a successful relationship for mac airport alternatives and tiger/panther/jaguar users in the far future with that kind of thinking by RALINK. I do need to remove and install the card when packing up but a small price for real wifi capability (even gets signal driving with Macstumbler/iStumbler have not played with KisMac so far on this card).Īccording to RALINKtech forums (see here: ), there are a number of other USB dongle devices that work, so long as the guts of the dongle are truly the RA2500USB.Īmong the other things worthy to note, RALINK has GPL'd the driver set for Linux.
I also have the option of adding an external antenna (which I did, similar to the WLE-DA from Buffalo but smaller, easily fits in my pack). I removed my internal airport card and now have a 'native' 802.11g card without the Extreme and much better signal. I could not figure out how to leave my internal card in and add a network interface for the Buffalo card (did strange things like duplicating both entries and could not separately control). It is recognized by the system as an airport card and displays in the menubar as such. I have been pleased with their products and they are very likely to be compatible with Airport/Airport Extreme including base stations and WDS. Īs for the other comment regarding alternative options, somewhat off topic but I will also make mention of Buffalo's WLI2-TX1-G54 Ethernet converter.
Maybe it is the poor antenna performance of the TiBook that protected me from damage. I personally have not seen this and have run my internal Airport card (802.11b) and my Orininco even sharing my wifi from one to the other with SunShield configuring my Powerbook(TiBook) as a router. I would be interested in more information or sources on the potential damage issue.
0 kommentar(er)
